Avoiding the Truth-Default Trap

Somebody I know has been blatantly spreading lies for a while. It seems that many people are believing him…

This made me stop and reflect: why are people so consistently bad at detecting lies?

Nobel laureate Daniel Kahneman showed us how our brains rely on shortcuts; Timothy Levine’s Truth-Default Theory (TDT) explains one of the most consequential shortcuts of all: we are wired to believe that people are telling the truth.

What is the Truth-Default?

Levine’s research demonstrates that in ordinary conversation, we rarely assume deception. Instead, we default to believing what others say unless a trigger compels us to question it.

In a well-known experiment, students participated in a trivia quiz with a cash prize at stake. A confederate suggested they secretly look at the answers. Around 30% cheated. Later, when asked if they had cheated, all denied it. Observers who watched video interviews of the students were no better than chance, detecting lies only about 56% of the time.

The key lesson? Our brains assume truth. Even when deception occurs, we rarely suspect it unless something forces us to.

Why Truth-Default Exists

Truth-default is not a flaw of human cognition, it is an adaptive feature. Efficient communication and social trust depend on assuming honesty. If every statement had to be verified before acceptance, society would grind to a halt.

Levine argues that truth-default only suspends when a sufficient number of triggers arise, such as:

• Detecting a motive for deception.
• Spotting inconsistencies between words and facts.
• Receiving third-party warnings.
• Encountering coherence gaps between what you know and what you hear.

Absent these triggers, people remain in truth-default mode, even when deception would be costly.

The Problem with Relying on ‘Cues’

Traditional deception detection theories focus on body language, shifty eyes, fidgeting, posture changes. But research across 58 countries shows these cues are unreliable. Professionals such as police officers, judges, and customs agents, despite training, perform no better than average students in detecting lies. Accuracy hovers around 54–56%.

In other words: we cannot “see” lies in facial expressions or gestures. What works better is examining context, the goals, incentives, and circumstances in which someone is speaking.

Why This Matters in Business

In daily life, truth-default mostly serves us well. White lies are usually harmless, and suspicion would corrode relationships. But in business and negotiation, the stakes are higher.

• Bernie Madoff’s Ponzi scheme thrived for over 20 years because investors and regulators could not convince themselves to suspend their truth-default, even when the numbers made no sense. We will look at this in a subsequent article on cognitive illusions.
• In negotiations, the so-called special exemption thesis suggests that bluffing is more acceptable in business than in personal life. Many negotiators see withholding or distorting information as part of the “game.”

Yet this is exactly where truth-default becomes dangerous. Material motives for deception exist, but decision-makers still fail to activate skepticism until it is too late.

How to Avoid the TDT Trap in Business

Awareness of TDT is the first step, but not the last. Here are practical strategies:

1. Look Beyond Words and Cues
   Focus less on posture or eye contact and more on whether the other party’s goals align with their statements. Ask: Does what I’m being told make sense given what they stand to gain or lose?
2. Use Structured Skepticism
   Introduce decision protocols, checklists, independent verification, and pre-mortem analysis (imagining a deal has failed and asking why). These methods force System 2 thinking and prevent overreliance on gut feeling.
3. Separate Bluffing from Deception
   Distinguish between acceptable negotiation tactics (strategic silence, framing) and unethical or fraudulent misrepresentation. This helps maintain trust while protecting against exploitation.
4. Build in Third-Party Checks
   External audits, cross-functional reviews, or trusted advisors reduce reliance on one individual’s truth-default and expose inconsistencies sooner.
5. Recognize Triggers and Act
   When inconsistencies, motives, or third-party warnings emerge, pause. Do not dismiss them. TDT research shows that it is after the fact that most deceptions are caught. Acting on triggers early reduces exposure.

Truth-default makes civil society possible. But in business, especially in negotiations, compliance, and investments, the cost of misplaced trust can be devastating. As Malcolm Gladwell observed in Talking to Strangers, “civil society cannot function without default to truth.” Yet as Madoff proved, it can also destroy fortunes when left unchecked.

The best leaders and negotiators do not abandon trust; they balance it with structured skepticism, contextual awareness, and disciplined decision-making. That is how to avoid the truth-default trap.

Swadeck Taher OSK is a Chartered Accountant (ICAEW) and a Chartered Marketer (CIM) running businesses and coaching, consulting, mentoring CEOs and entrepreneurs ranging from startups through family businesses to established top 100 companies in Mauritius. He enjoys sharing the expertise he developed over the last thirty years at senior leadership/directorship level with his clients, business partners and other budding entrepreneurs.

Swadeck is also a GTD Practitioner and a Certified GTD Trainer. He helps others experience what the Productive Experience feels like and how they too can savour stress free productivity.

Sakeenah Co Ltd is the only Certified International Partner of the David Allen Company in Mauritius.

GTD® and Getting Things Done® are registered trademarks of the David Allen Company.

Disclaimer: All images are copyright to their respective owners. If any of the images used in this article belongs to you and you wish these removed, please send me a message and I shall oblige.